The Story of Palestine

Home Front

HOME FRONT: Mohammed El Kurd (1 of 4)


HOME FRONT: Terry Benninga (2 of 4)


HOME FRONT: Amal Qassem (3 of 4)


HOME FRONT: Gil Gutglick (4 of 4)

研究指出以色列佔領行動重創巴勒斯坦經濟

轉貼來源:紀念若雪巴勒斯坦資訊網Palestine Information Website
http://palinfo.habago.org/archives/2011/10/05/19.34.33/

Harriet Sherwood於拉馬拉報導；Liz Lai 譯；李鑑慧 校訂
Date: 2011.10.05
原文出處：2011.09.29英國衛報



在Shuweike村附近，巴勒斯坦農人Mussa Samamreh（圖右）仔細檢查園裡橄欖樹的斷枝，他的樹園據當地村民說遭到以色列屯民的破壞。攝影：Abed al-Hashlamoun/EPA




一份在拉馬拉（Ramallah）出版的研究報告顯示：以色列在西岸與迦薩的佔領行動使巴勒斯坦每年承受44億歐元的經濟損失，相當於巴人85%的名義國內生產毛額。

這份研究指出，以色列對巴勒斯坦之「佔領事業」不但對巴勒斯坦經濟造成損害，它還讓以色列與她境內的企業得以藉巴勒斯坦之自然與觀光資源獲利。

「不論巴勒斯坦人迄今靠著自己的力量成就了什麼，佔領行動讓我們無法像居住在自己國家的自由人民一般，完全發揮經濟潛力。」巴勒斯坦自治政府的經濟部長Hasan Abu Libdeh在這份於週四發表的報告中如此表示。他並且說：「國際社會應該要知道，以色列不願意為和平盡最大努力的原因之一，正在於此佔領行動所能提供給她的經濟利益。」

研究顯示，若以方停止佔領行動，巴勒斯坦的經濟規模將可以達到目前的近兩倍，而這也可以減少巴勒斯坦對國際救援的依賴。

這份報告乃是由巴勒斯坦當局之經濟部以及「耶路撒冷應用研究協會」（Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem）所共同完成，是第一個將以色列佔領行為對巴勒斯坦經濟所造成的影響進行量化的研究。它指出：「關於總損失的金額，目前得到的數字是2010年的68.97億美元，高達巴勒斯坦國內生產總額的84.9%。」

「這些損失與安全考量並無太大相關，主要造成因素乃是來自以色列對巴人種種嚴格的限制，這些限制使得巴人無法利用自己所擁有的自然資源，但以方卻得以剝削巴人之水、礦產、鹽、石材與土地等資源。」

研究報告將這近69億美元的損失細分為幾大項，其中包括：封鎖迦薩造成的損失為19億美元、限制用水19億美元、限制使用自然資源18億美元、進出口限制2億8千8百萬美元、交通限制1億8千4百萬美元、死海的觀光收入1億4千3百萬美元。

報告並且顯示，以色列的佔領「對巴勒斯坦的經濟發展設下無數的限制，它讓巴人無法在自己的土地上使用自己的自然資源，將巴勒斯坦孤立於國際市場之外，並將巴人的活動區域限縮在幾個零星的區塊中。」

迦薩地區的經濟高度依賴進出口物資，但封鎖則對進出口設下嚴厲的限制。該區遭受的武力轟炸使得多數基礎建設被破壞以及原物料短缺，這也使得水電供應無法應付工業及農業發展之需求。

許多欲進口至西岸及迦薩的物資被以色列認為具有「雙重用途」而遭到限制，如化學藥品與肥料可能被加工成為武器，這項限制對該區的製造業與農業造成了嚴重影響。

在西岸地區，路障、哨站與分道政策對物資與人力的流通都帶來限制，這使得巴勒斯坦經濟發展受到嚴重壓縮。研究將西岸與其他城市間的直接交通路線與巴勒斯坦人所必須迂迴通行的路線做了比較。如，西岸北方的那不勒斯（Nablus）與約旦河谷的al-Jiftlik兩地間，直接路線為36英里（58公里），但巴勒斯坦人必須繞行的路線卻使得這段路程必須增加至107英里（173公里），造成時間與物資的重大損失。

▲駐守中東西岸的以色列邊境巡警在哨站檢查巴勒斯坦婦女的證件，一群婦女正排隊等候要進入耶路撒冷，圖攝於2011年8月12日。（圖文／路透）

巴勒斯坦人禁止進入死海地區的規定使他們無法藉由該地的礦產、鹽與觀光資源而獲利—這些都成為了以色列的經濟收入來源。報告指出，死海地區的資源可以製作美容美膚產品，而以色列的公司每年藉由生產與銷售這些產品可創造高達1億5千美元（9千6百歐元）之利潤。

以色列的公司也藉由在西岸進行的採礦與鑿石作業而獲利。西岸的水資源並且被導入以色列屯墾區、工業區與農業區。研究指出，以色列人由西岸的三大地下蓄水層所汲取的水資源是巴勒斯坦人的10倍之多。約有250萬棵樹，其中包括橄欖樹叢，自1967年起因為屯墾區、基礎建設與隔離牆之建立而被連根拔起。研究估計每棵成年橄欖樹的年產量為70公斤，每公斤的產品可獲利1.1美元。

巴勒斯坦農人多失去了土地或是無法進入自己的土地耕作。Abu Libdeh說，「（西岸與東耶路撒冷地區）有62萬屯民在6萬4千德南（dumans；1德南約1000平方米）的土地上耕作，而400萬居住在西岸的巴勒斯坦人，則僅能耕作10萬德南的土地」。

「在我們準備建國的同時，我們希望這會是個能夠經濟自主、對環境友善、見容於國際社會的永續生存的國度，」他表示「以色列在土地權利、交通、自然資源使用等方面設下種種限制，使得巴勒斯坦人無法自己營生。要建立能夠永續生存的巴勒斯坦，以色列必須停止終止佔領行動。」

由聯合國、歐盟、美國與俄國所共同構成的「中東四重奏」（Middle East Quartet）上週發表聲明，嘗試讓以巴雙方再度展開和談。對此，巴勒斯坦領導人於週四表示這乃是「令人鼓舞」的發展。「巴勒斯坦解放組織」的資深官員Yasser Abed Rabbo在巴解的執委會議後對外表示：「我們呼籲以色列尊重這項發言中所提出的原則及相關參考事項。」

他說：「『中東四重奏』此次聲明特別提及以巴雙方於『和平路線圖』（譯註：此為『中東四重奏』於2003年針對以巴問題所提出之和平方案）下之義務，以及呼籲避免煽動行為的發生。我們認為這構成明確呼籲，要求以色列停止各種形式的屯墾行為，這是個令人振奮的徵兆。」

以色列內閣於週二就這項發言進行會議討論，但無法達成共識並做出回應。

個案研究

位於那不勒斯的Pal Karm化妝品公司主要生產銷售化妝品以及保養品，銷售對象是當地市場以及以色列。甘油是該公司產品的主要原料。自2007年中起，以色列禁止甘油進口至巴勒斯坦自治區，從那時開始，該公司的產品即無法在以色列市場販售，因為以色列的健康部門規定該類產品必須含有甘油成分。這個公司估計其產品因此在以色列市場損失了30%的獲利。

* 完整研究報告請見「耶路撒冷應用研究協會」（Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem）網站

楊宗緯@20111010大彩虹音樂節

Goodbye R.E.M.

Palestinians submit statehood request to UN

Orphan Elephants 肯亞大象孤兒院的故事

source: National Geographic Magazine
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/09/orphan-elephants/siebert-text

Orphans No More

After the trauma of attack and loss comes healing—and a richer understanding of the emotions and intelligence of elephants.

By Charles Siebert
Photograph by Michael Nichols

Along the northern rim of Kenya's Nairobi National Park, a mysterious array of brightly colored wool blankets can be seen draped over the gnarled branches of some of the forest's upwardly braiding croton trees. Set against the region's otherwise drab browns and greens, the hanging blankets could be construed as remnants of some ancient tribal ritual—until shortly before five each evening, when their function as part of a new interspecies experiment becomes apparent.

Off in the distance a few upright figures in bright green coats and crumpled white safari hats appear, calling out names in trilling, high-pitched voices: "Kalama!" "Kitirua!" "Olare!" All at once baby elephants emerge from the brush, a straggled procession of 18 flap-eared brown heads, their long trunks steering their bulbous heft with a heavily hypnotic grace. They come to rest beneath the color-draped trees, where the keepers tie a blanket around each one for warmth before resuming the trek home.

Home is the Nairobi nursery of the David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust, the world's most successful orphan-elephant rescue and rehabilitation center. The nursery takes in orphan elephants from all over Kenya, many victims of poaching or human-wildlife conflict, and raises them until they are no longer milk dependent. Once healed and stabilized at the nursery, they are moved more than a hundred miles southeast to two holding centers in Tsavo National Park. There, at their own pace, which can be up to eight to ten years, they gradually make the transition back into the wild. The program is a cutting-edge experiment in cross-species empathy that only the worst extremes of human insensitivity could have necessitated.

These are sad and perilous days for the world's largest land animal. Once elephants roamed the Earth like waterless whales, plying ancient migratory routes ingrained in their prodigious memories. Now they've been backed into increasingly fragmented territories. When not being killed for their tusks or for bush meat, they are struggling against loss of habitat due to human population pressures and drought. A 1979 survey of African elephants estimated a population of about 1.3 million. About 500,000 remain. In Asia an estimated 40,000 are left in the wild. And yet even as the elephant population dwindles, the number of human-elephant conflicts rises. In Africa, reports of elephants and villagers coming into conflict with each other appear almost daily.

A recent arrival at the Nairobi nursery was an elephant named Murka, rescued near Tsavo National Park with a spear lodged deep between her eyes and gaping spear and axe wounds along her back and sides. The spear had penetrated ten inches, rupturing her sinuses, which prevented her from using her trunk to drink. Her deep wounds were filled with maggots. Most likely orphaned by poachers who killed her mother for profit, the one-year-old baby is believed to have been subsequently attacked by local Maasai tribesmen who were angry about losing their traditional grazing land to the park. A mobile vet unit was able to tranquilize her, clean her wounds, and extract the spear.

The plight of elephants has become so dire that their greatest enemy—humans—is also their only hope, a topsy-turvy reality that moved a woman named Daphne Sheldrick to establish the nursery back in 1987. Sheldrick is fourth-generation Kenya-born and has spent the better part of her life tending wild animals. Her husband was David Sheldrick, the renowned naturalist and founding warden of Tsavo East National Park who died of a heart attack in 1977. She's reared abandoned baby buffalo, dik-diks, impalas, zebras, warthogs, and black rhinos, among others, but no creature has beguiled her more than elephants.

Orphan infant elephants are a challenge to raise because they remain fully dependent on their mother's milk for the first two years of life and partially so until the age of four. In the decades the Sheldricks spent together in Tsavo, they never succeeded in raising an orphan younger than one because they couldn't find a formula that matched the nutritional qualities of a mother's milk. Aware that elephant milk is high in fat, they tried adding cream and butter to the mix, but found the babies had trouble digesting it and soon died. They then used a nonfat milk that the elephants could digest better, but eventually, after growing thinner and thinner on that formula, these orphans succumbed as well. Shortly before David's death, the couple finally arrived at a precise mixture of human baby formula and coconut. This kept alive a three-week-old orphan named Aisha, helping her grow stronger every day.

It was Aisha that revealed to Daphne another essential ingredient for raising an orphan elephant. When Daphne traveled to Nairobi to prepare for a daughter's wedding, she left Aisha, then six months old, in the care of an assistant. In the two weeks she was away, Aisha stopped eating and died, apparently overcome with grief at the loss of another mother. "When Aisha died, I realized the mistake I'd made," says Daphne, still pained by the memory. "She missed me too much. You mustn't let an elephant get too attached to one person. It was stupid of me to think I could do it without substituting a larger family. I mean, I knew wild elephants. I had watched the elephants in Tsavo my entire married life, so I should have known better. One just has to look at an elephant group to understand the importance of family. So we have to replace what the elephant would have in the wild."

Any wild elephant group is, in essence, one large and highly sensitive organism. Young elephants are raised within a matriarchal family of doting female caregivers, beginning with the birth mother and then branching out to include sisters, cousins, aunts, grandmothers, and established friends. These bonds endure over a life span that can be as long as 70 years. Young elephants stay close to their mothers and extended family members—males until they are about 14, females for life. When a calf is threatened or harmed, all the other elephants comfort and protect it.

This cohesiveness is enforced by a complex communication system. When close to each other, elephants employ a range of vocalizations, from low rumblings to high-pitched screams and trumpets, along with assorted visual signals. They express a range of emotions using their trunk, ears, head, and tail. When they need to communicate over longer distances, they use powerful low-frequency, rumbling calls that can be heard by others more than a mile away.

After a death, family members show signs of grief and exhibit ritualistic behavior. Field biologists such as Joyce Poole, who has studied Africa's elephants for more than 35 years, describe elephants trying to lift the dead body and covering it with dirt and brush. Poole once watched a female stand guard over her stillborn baby for three days, her head, ears, and trunk drooped in grief. Elephants may revisit the bones of the deceased for months, even years, touching them with their trunks and creating paths to visit the carcass.

What has amazed Sheldrick most since establishing the Nairobi nursery is how readily even severely traumatized babies begin to reweave the elaborate social fabric of the wild group. "They are born with a genetic memory and are extremely social animals," she says. "They intuitively know to be submissive before elders, and the females are instinctively maternal, even from a very young age. Whenever we get a new baby here, the others will come around and lovingly put their trunks on its back to comfort it. They have such big hearts."

Standing amid a group of orphans one afternoon as they browsed on croton tree branches, I was struck by their distinct personalities. Kalama, a female found at five weeks old in a water well in northern Samburu, was cheeky and playful. Kitirua, found abandoned at around 18 months old near a swamp in Amboseli National Park, was a recent arrival and still shy and aloof. Tano, a four-month-old suspected poaching victim from the Laikipia region of central Kenya, had become so close to the keepers that she kept pushing other orphans away out of jealousy. Yet another suspected poaching victim, Chemi Chemi, was a mischievous male elephant. "We call him al Qaeda," explained Edwin Lusichi, the nursery's head elephant keeper. "He's always shoving us and the other orphan elephants around."

It was as though I were hanging out with a group of precocious schoolkids vying to establish their standing and make an impression on the new kid on the playground. When I approached an achingly adorable two-month-old female named Sities, I soon found myself deposited in a nearby bush by the cracked-leather rump of another elephant, getting a parting stomp on my foot for good measure.

"That's Olare," Lusichi called out, gesturing toward the one-year-old that had just put me in my place. "She's practicing to be a matriarch."

When it was time to head toward the nursery stables, I positioned myself along one flank of the pachyderm procession. I'd started off toward the trees of blankets, when an elephant trunk suddenly struck my midsection with such force that I dropped to my knees.

"I forgot to warn you," Lusichi said, helping me up with a broad smile. "Tumaren doesn't like it when anyone walks ahead of her."

Spend enough time around elephants and it's difficult not to anthropomorphize their behavior. "Elephants are very human animals," says Sheldrick, sitting one afternoon on the back porch of her house at the edge of the nursery grounds, the wide, acacia-dotted plains of Nairobi National Park sprawling in the distance. "Their emotions are exactly the same as ours. They've lost their families, have seen their mothers slaughtered, and they come here filled with aggression—devastated, broken, and grieving. They suffer from nightmares and sleeplessness."

What makes this particular moment in the fraught history of elephant-human relations so remarkable is that the long-accrued anecdotal evidence of the elephant's extraordinary intelligence is being borne out by science. Studies show that structures in the elephant brain are strikingly similar to those in humans. MRI scans of an elephant's brain suggest a large hippocampus, the component in the mammalian brain linked to memory and an important part of its limbic system, which is involved in processing emotions. The elephant brain has also been shown to possess an abundance of the specialized neurons known as spindle cells, which are thought to be associated with self-awareness, empathy, and social awareness in humans. Elephants have even passed the mirror test of self-recognition, something only humans, and some great apes and dolphins, had been known to do.

This common neurobiology has prompted some scientists to explore whether young elephants that have experienced assaults on their psyches may be exhibiting signs of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), just like orphaned children in the wake of war or genocide. Gay Bradshaw, a psychologist and the director of the Kerulos Center in Oregon, has brought the latest insights from human neuroscience and psychology to bear on startling field observations of elephant behavior. She suspects that some threatened elephant populations might be suffering from chronic stress and trauma brought on by human encroachment and killing.

Before the international ivory trade ban in 1989, poaching took a steep toll on many elephant populations and in some instances significantly altered their social structure because poachers tended to target older elephants. Field biologists found that the number of older matriarchs, female caregivers, and bulls in vulnerable groups had fallen drastically. In Uganda, for instance, one study reported that many females between the ages of 15 and 25 had no close family members whatsoever.

In the decades since the ban, some populations have stabilized, though most elephants remain threatened by human encroachment. As poaching has flared up in the past five years in the Congo Basin and large swaths of central and eastern Africa, many elephant families there have lost most of their adult females. Where such social upheaval exists, calves are being raised by ever more inexperienced females. An increasing number of young orphaned elephants, many of which have witnessed the death of a parent through culling or at the hands of poachers, are coming of age in the absence of the traditional support system. "The loss of older elephants," says Bradshaw, "and the extreme psychological and physical trauma of witnessing the massacres of their family members interferes with a young elephant's normal development."

Bradshaw speculates that this early trauma, combined with the breakdown in social structure, may account for some instances of aberrant elephant behavior that have been reported by field biologists. Between 1992 and 1997, for example, young male elephants in Pilanesberg Game Reserve in South Africa killed more than 40 rhinoceroses—an unusual level of aggression—and in some cases had attempted to mount them. The young elephants were adolescent males that had witnessed their families being shot in cullings at Kruger National Park—sanctioned killings to keep elephant populations under control. At that time it was common practice for such orphaned elephant babies to be tethered to the bodies of their dead relatives until they could be rounded up for translocation to new territories. Once moved to Pilanesberg, the orphans matured without the support of any adult males. "Young males often follow older, sexually active males around," says Joyce Poole, "appearing to study what they do. These youngsters had no such role models."

For Allan Schore, an expert on human trauma disorders at UCLA who has co-authored papers with Bradshaw, the behavior of these elephants conforms to a diagnosis of PTSD in humans. "A large body of research shows that the neurobiological mechanisms of attachment are found in many mammals, including humans and elephants," he explains. "The emotional relationship between the mother and her offspring impacts the wiring of the infants' developing brain. When early experiences are traumatic, there is a thinning down of the developing brain circuits, especially in areas that process emotional information and regulate stress. That means less resilience and an enduring deficit in aggression regulation, social communication, and empathy."

One effort to repair the torn fabric of an elephant group lends further support to the idea that early trauma and a lack of role models can lead to aggression: After Joyce Poole suggested that park rangers in South Africa introduce six older bull elephants into Pilanesberg's population of about 85 elephants, the aberrant behavior of the marauding adolescent males—and their premature hormonal changes—abruptly stopped.

If elephants can wound like us, they can heal like us as well, perhaps more readily. With humans acting as stand-ins for their mothers, along with the help of the other nursery elephants, the majority of the orphans that survive recover to become fully functional wild elephants again. To date, Sheldrick's nursery has successfully raised more than a hundred orphan elephants. They have returned to the wild in wary, halting, half measures at first, having become "homo-pachyderms," caught between a deep devotion to their human caregivers and the irresistible call of their true selves.

One evening during the dry season a huge group of wild elephants emerged from the bush to drink at the water trough at the Ithumba compound in Tsavo, one of two locations where the orphans transition to the wild. There were 25 to 30 elephants—massive, long-tusked bulls and matriarchs, adolescent males and females, some ex-orphans, and several newborn calves. Directly alongside the trough were the open-air stockades where the Ithumba orphans had already gathered for the night, staring over at their wild counterparts, which, between sips, stared back. The keepers and I were standing no more than 30 yards from the wild group, much closer than one usually would get. And the elephants were much closer to humans than wild ones normally venture. The dreamlike scene was dictated by the presence of the orphans and their conversations with the wild group. "They have let the wild ones know it is OK," explained Benjamin Kyalo, Ithumba's head elephant keeper. "The word is clearly being spread around Tsavo: Good humans. Good water. Let's go!"

By day the keepers lead the orphans into the bush to browse. They deliver midday bottles of formula at a designated mud-bath venue. When a cluster of wild elephant heads appears in the distance, the keepers keep the milk-dependent orphans close, not allowing them to leave with the group. But by the age of five or seven, the orphans may go off with the wild ones. Some will stay out for a few nights before returning to the stockades, as though they'd been away at a sleepover. Some will go for good, becoming full-fledged members of their own wild families.

One orphan named Loijuk was so eager to join a wild group that she twice opened the Ithumba gate with her trunk and let herself out. Months after the second breakout she had become a member of a wild ex-orphan group. Another precocious orphan named Irima was just over three years old and still milk dependent when he insinuated himself into a wild group near Voi, the other stockade where orphans are introduced to the wild. After five days the Voi keepers heard a series of frantic, high-pitched elephant trumpets coming from the direction of an electrified fence. "Irima must have told the group that he still needed his milk and orphan family and wanted to go back, so Edo [a former orphan] escorted him home," Voi's head keeper, Joseph Sauni, recalls. "The keepers opened the gate, and Edo escorted Irima all the way back to the stockades. Edo drank some water from the well, ate some food, and took off again. Mission accomplished."

Even fully "repatriated" orphans like Edo will return to the stockades to visit their human family. In December 2008 Emily, a matriarch that had been brought to the Nairobi nursery in 1993, showed up at the Voi stockades one afternoon with her group and a surprise guest. "She'd given birth the day before, about a mile away," says Sauni. "She led the baby here to show us her newborn. We named her Eve."

Back at the Nairobi nursery the baby elephants return for their six o'clock feeding, breaking into a full sprint once they see the line of keepers holding up huge bottles of milk before each of the stables. A major ruckus ensues when they arrive—some stable assignments have changed to make room for a new arrival, and elephants hate alterations to their routine. The nursery's most veteran keeper, Mishak Nzimbi—known as the "elephant whisperer" and the clear favorite of all the orphans—steps into the fray. Heeding little more than an upheld hand and one stern utterance, the residents settle into place, sucking down gallons of formula in seconds.

"The control the keepers have over these elephants, without even a stick or anything!" marvels Daphne's younger daughter, Angela, the current executive director of the David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust. "It all stems from the elephants' desire to please someone they love. It's amazing and beautiful to see. With elephants you reap what you sow, and the way you get the most out of them is through love."

We walk over to the stable marked Murka—the orphan that had been found with a spear lodged in her head. "Now look at her," Daphne says, as Murka, with only the slightest indent in her forehead to show for her brutal ordeal, approaches the half-opened door of her stable and takes two of my fingers to suckle on. "The vets didn't expect her to make it through the first night."

"And she's healed psychologically," Angela adds. "She was one extremely traumatized little elephant when she first woke up, lashing out at everyone—and rightly so. But slowly she began to trust again, and after about a month she wasn't just fine about people, she was seeking them out. And it wasn't just our doing. She would never have recovered so quickly without the input of other elephants."

All around us orphans and keepers are settling in for the night. Each elephant sleeps with a different keeper every night to prevent it from getting too attached to a particular person—and perhaps vice versa. Leaning on the stable door, Nzimbi, Murka's overseer for the night, recalls first visiting the nursery 22 years earlier. He immediately asked Daphne for a job. "I understand these animals," he says. "I love them so much."

Directly above Murka's straw-and-blanket bed is Nzimbi's bunk, with a small radio perched by his pillow. I ask if he has an alarm clock to wake him for the elephants' feedings.

"Oh no," he says. "Every three hours you feel a trunk reach up and pull your blankets off. The elephants are our alarms."